The Int-Trick to Stop Scientology Worldwide

If someone had the power and intention to internationally subvert Scientology from the inside and abuse it for dark purposes, how could they go about that? They would have to twist the Tech with minimum changes in such a way that the gains that could be drawn from the bridge remain minimal. With one exception: […]

More Info

Tone-40 Auditing Rehabilitated

Free Scientologists Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Gross, Switzerland FS Bulletin of 6. November 2003R Revised 17. Oct. 200713)Revised in order to mark the quotes red and give all references. A significant process has been lost in the Church: How to audit Tone-40-Processes. This happened because the tech originally developed in the 50s has been rephrased and republished […]

More Info

Where should I do my bridge? In the CoS or outside of it?

Where should I do my bridge? In the CoS or outside of it?9)This composition of doubt was published again in 2005 because it may help others make a similar one. It is important to compare the right alternatives. It is not about belonging to either the Church or the Freezone. There is nothing wrong about […]

More Info

David Mayo is the prime suspect of having been the instrument to sabotage LRH-tech.

Caspar de Rijk, Class IX made an eval on the tech alter is and came to the conclusion, that also since 1975 the tech of LRH was alter-ised to an unworkable state. When he wrote this, Caspar was the founder of the RONS Org Netherland.

More Info

E-METER SENSITIVITY AND EM-5RB

The new management of the Church of Scientology has been modifying LRH references about the basics of auditing since 1972 so that the tech is more and more non-working. An example for this is the handling of the e-meter. The Snr C/S from the Berlin Org A.Z. was on his class VI course when the […]

More Info

The Evil Role of David Mayo

David Mayo plays a very controversial role in the history of Scientology: For some (CoS) he was the bad scapegoat, an SP and a squirrel, and for others (Free Zone) he was the only true “Senior C/S Int” and the personal auditor of LRH and his technical successor. I would like to gather a bit […]

More Info

Change of the Auditor’s Code – Removal of LRH!

Change of the Auditor’s Code5)This essay has already been published by me in a similar way as a-codex.htm on my website www.FreieScientologen.de on August 18, 2004. The observation of this change was done by others, I simply picked up on it and published it. – Removal of LRH! I have come across a severe swindle […]

More Info

How a black bridge is built

The takeover team of the church was obviously successful in changing the Bridge and Tech in such a way that we are dealing with Black Scientology: So we got an inverted application so that the people are not freed but rather enslaved. But the following also applies here: Recognized danger means averted danger! References   [ + […]

More Info

NED Criticism – Rehab Standard Dianetics

References: NED Date Title 1 21.06.78 NEW ERA DIANETICS SERIES 1 2 22.06.78 NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE 3 19.06.78 OBJECTIVE ARC3)As an objective process, NED-Serie 3 OBJECTIVE ARC does not belong to dianetics anyway and is only supposed to give the series one more edition so that it actually looks like something. […]

More Info

There is no Natural Clear

The false data of “Natural Clears” comes from David Mayo, and not from LRH, because Ron writes: We know all the attributes of Clear and Operating Thetans. In the history of this universe there has never been a true Clear or true OT. Every Clear ever encountered in this universe was a Keyed-Out Clear – […]

More Info

The directing of attention It’s more blessed to give than receive

Every child knows: “Knife, scissors, fire and light are not for small children!”32)Translated from a German proverb And every educated mother nowadays knows how to best enforce this control with small children. Manipulation psychology offers parents a tool from the trick box: Instead of taking away the object desired by the child – which would […]

More Info

Bridge to total freedom – a no-game Condition

Since 1965, Ron has called our bridge simply “Classification and Gradation Chart“ Since 1983, the new Church management has renamed the bridge to “Bridge to total freedom“!? This wording contains a no-game condition and is therefore out-tech! Ron wrote this in September 1956 in a book: References   [ + ] 1. ↑ On http://www.scientology.org/en_US/religion/bridge/pg001.html

More Info