Where should I do my bridge? In the CoS or outside of it?
Where should I do my bridge? In the CoS or outside of it?1)This composition of doubt was published again in 2005 because it may help others make a similar one. It is important to compare the right alternatives. It is not about belonging to either the Church or the Freezone. There is nothing wrong about […]
Continue readingDavid Mayo is the prime suspect of having been the instrument to sabotage LRH-tech.
Caspar de Rijk, Class IX made an eval on the tech alter is and came to the conclusion, that also since 1975 the tech of LRH was alter-ised to an unworkable state. When he wrote this, Caspar was the founder of the RONS Org Netherland.
Continue readingThe Evil Role of David Mayo
David Mayo plays a very controversial role in the history of Scientology: For some (CoS) he was the bad scapegoat, an SP and a squirrel, and for others (Free Zone) he was the only true “Senior C/S Int” and the personal auditor of LRH and his technical successor. I would like to gather a bit […]
Continue readingChange of the Auditor’s Code – Removal of LRH!
Change of the Auditor’s Code5)This essay has already been published by me in a similar way as a-codex.htm on my website www.FreieScientologen.de on August 18, 2004. The observation of this change was done by others, I simply picked up on it and published it. – Removal of LRH! I have come across a severe swindle […]
Continue readingHow a black bridge is built
The takeover team of the church was obviously successful in changing the Bridge and Tech in such a way that we are dealing with Black Scientology: So we got an inverted application so that the people are not freed but rather enslaved. But the following also applies here: Recognized danger means averted danger! References [ + […]
Continue readingNED Criticism – Rehab Standard Dianetics
References: NED Date Title 1 21.06.78 NEW ERA DIANETICS SERIES 1 2 22.06.78 NEW ERA DIANETICS FULL PC PROGRAM OUTLINE 3 19.06.78 OBJECTIVE ARC3)As an objective process, NED-Serie 3 OBJECTIVE ARC does not belong to dianetics anyway and is only supposed to give the series one more edition so that it actually looks like something. […]
Continue readingThere is no Natural Clear
The false data of “Natural Clears” comes from David Mayo, and not from LRH, because Ron writes: We know all the attributes of Clear and Operating Thetans. In the history of this universe there has never been a true Clear or true OT. Every Clear ever encountered in this universe was a Keyed-Out Clear – […]
Continue readingThe directing of attention It’s more blessed to give than receive
Every child knows: “Knife, scissors, fire and light are not for small children!”32)Translated from a German proverb And every educated mother nowadays knows how to best enforce this control with small children. Manipulation psychology offers parents a tool from the trick box: Instead of taking away the object desired by the child – which would […]
Continue readingBridge to total freedom – a no-game Condition
Since 1965, Ron has simply called our bridge, the “Classification and Gradation Chart” Since 1983, the new Church management has renamed the bridge to “Bridge to Total Freedom”! This issue tells you, why that is evil:
Continue readingThe Emperor’s New Clothes
The following fairytale by Hans Christian Andersen shows the close connection between ethics, withholds, awareness, integrity and PTSness: Many years ago there was an Emperor so exceedingly fond of new clothes that he spent all his money on being well dressed. He cared nothing about reviewing his soldiers, going to the theatre, or going for […]
Continue readingForget NED! Rehab the Pattern of Standard Dianetics
Free Scientologists Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Gross, Switzerland FS Bulletin of 30. January 2005RC Issue 1 Revised: 17. Jan 2006; 25. Aug 2006; 4. Nov 2006 & 1. Mar 2015 Dianetics Course (Ref. HCOB 26 JUNE 1978RA Issue II REVISED 4 SEPT 1978 RE-REVISED 15 SEPT 1978 ROUTINE 3RA – ENGRAM RUNNING BY CHAINS BTB 6 MAY […]
Continue readingChronological Overview of the Takeover of Scientology
“It must be kept in mind and brought forward emphatically that Scientology does not work in the absence of official control and no matter who sought to use its principles, has uniformly failed in the hands of non‑Scientologists and organizations not controlled by the Central Organizations of Scientology or myself. The reason for this declaration […]
Continue reading
English
Deutsch
Italiano