The directing of attention It’s more blessed to give than receive

dog listening with big earEvery child knows: “Knife, scissors, fire and light are not for small children!”1)Translated from a German proverb

And every educated mother nowadays knows how to best enforce this control with small children. Manipulation psychology offers parents a tool from the trick box: Instead of taking away the object desired by the child – which would lead to a big fit – you hand the child something else to play with and direct the attention elsewhere. “It’s more blessed to give than receive.”

Nowadays, every government knows how to use this tactic on its people. About 100 years ago, governments were a lot less competent. We had censorship, books were banned and burned. Gatherings were supervised and broken up by the police if issues “got out of hand.” Instead of brutally taking away the critical books and gatherings from the people, they are controlled like little children: You put them in front of the TV with a bottle and everything is good. “It’s more blessed to give than receive”.

Within all this simple direction of attention a technology came into existence about half a century ago with which the people could have freed themselves of this primitive patronization: Dianetics and Scientology by L. Ron Hubbard. By auditing, an enslaved person becomes free again. With auditing, a person can shift his or her attention back to what is interesting to him or her. He or she isn’t as easily controllable any more. Simple games will now be seen through, for example this one: “Oh you mean Muslims, look at what you have done to us with the twin tower attack. That is why we are now invading Afghanistan (and no one is realizing that this war has been planned for years!)”.

So “considerate” forces worked on taking Scientology away from the people. However, the simple method did not work. Thus, there are demonstrations, people invoke their right to freedom of religion and they use the rule of law to their protection. So they had to act more cleverly. And as many have realized today, the leadership of Scientology has just been taken over in order to avoid the worst: its actual use. The prices for Scientology services have been drastically increased (partly increased by a hundredfold) so that only 1% of the people can afford the bridge. The remaining people have either turned away disappointedly or entered the game of becoming a millionaire first. Simple directing of attention.

However, the thing that is difficult to see through – and that is what this FSB is about – is how the “It’s more blessed to give than receive” principle has been used to destroy Scientology.

After the enemy had gained control of the leadership of the Scientology Church in 1977 and the Hubbard family had been eliminated, the key technologies of Scientology have been replaced piece by piece.

Be attentive now.

You have preserved

Only a bit

Of what

Lord Buddha

Said.

He said much more

But then there came

Men who said

Other things

And changed

A piece of this

A bit of that

And so we strayed.2)Hubbard, LaFayette Ron, 1974, Book “Hymn of Asia”, First Printing, Los Angeles, Publications Organization Worldwide.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” shown on the newly published books of 2007 In Summer 2007, the Churchies were electrified: The RTC announced the publication of 18 revised LRH books. David Miscavige explained in a 3-hour-long video why the books had to be reissued: The early editions back to the early 50s were very faulty: chapters were missing, words were written incorrectly, punctuation confused the reader. A pilot project with the books “proved”: Now you only need a fifth of the time to study these books! Because now they are “exactly the way LRH intended them to be”.

published

LRH Book Title

early 1948

Dianetics: The Original Thesis (since 1951)

former title: Abnormal Dianetics

original title: Scientology: A new Science,

temporary title between 1983 and 2006: The Dynamics of Life

Apr 50

Dianetics, The Evolution of a Science

9. May 1950

Dianetics: The modern science of mental health

June 1951

Science of Survival

Aug 51

Self Analysis

late Nov ’51

Advanced Procedure and Axioms

Dec 1951

Handbook for Preclears

July 1952

History of Man, A – What to Audit

Nov 52

Scientology 8-80

Dec 1952

Scientology 8-8008

Dec 1954

Dianetics 55!

Apr 55

Creation of Human Ability , The – A Handbook for Scientologists

Sep 56

Fundamentals of Thought, The

Dec 1956

The Problems of Work

Dec 1965

Scientology A new slant on life

July 1968

Introduction into Scientology Ethics

Nov 70

Scientology 0-8, Book of Basics

1981

The Way to Happiness

Since then, there has been a project in the US to shred all older books. Germany is leading with rushing obedience: former members of the Church are called: they are supposed to come in and bring their old books: to be burned!

The old books – as they were printed in Ron’s days – cannot be trusted anymore. Too many mistakes have been “proven.”3)However, you have to trust RTC and David Miscavige because he hasn’t proved any of it, he’s just made claims. But even old hands of the Freezone are going crazy about the new books: “I have to have these!”

Others react with a bit more distance and want to critically check up on it first: in October, the flag class XII auditor Pierre Ethier of the IFA4)International Freezone Association. See www.internationalfreezone.net announced to compare the books and publish his result:

“I have only one book so far, but will receive the rest shortly and make an extensive comparative study of all versions: original, 1970s, 1980-90 and 2007.

The results will be posted on my web page.5)www.upperbridge.org is a website worth reading, but afaik he failed to fulfill his promise, no further comparison of the books was published.

I agree there is far too many rumours on the matter. I will attempt to set the record straight over the next few months.”

The thing that is often overlooked in all this euphoria and scepticism is the following:

Two thirds of LRH books are taken out of circulation by this manoeuvre – only a third (the 18 by the grace of god) are supposed to stay! This claim is not my assumption but based on a report from Florida: There a Sea Org Mission has closely examined a larger field auditor’s office and criticized an edition of “The Book of Case Remedies” from 1991 – so an even earlier RTC edition!!! Should other books be found in the office besides the 18 reissued books, their license is threatened to be revoked.

So only superficially LRH books are increasingly read and studied.

In reality, the largest part is being removed from circulation, i.e. these following editions:

published

Title

January 51

Notes on the Lectures

Oct 1951

Child Dianetics, Dianetic Processing for Children

Apr 53

How To Live Though An Executive: Communication Manual

June 1954

Group Auditors Handbook – Volume One

Aug 68

The Phoenix Lectures

Aug 54

Scientology: Auditor’s Handbook – Including Intensive Procedure

Sep 54

Group Auditors Handbook – Volume Two

May 1957

All about Radiation

1959

Ceremonies of the Founding Church of Scientology

March 1960

Have you lived before this life? A Scientific survey.

May 1961

E-meter Essentials

Nov 64

Book of Case Remedies
– A manual covering Preclear difficulties and their remedies, The

Feb 65

Book of E-meter Drills, The

Apr 65

Scientology Abridged Dictionary

Sep 66

Introducing the E-Meter

1967

Scientology and the Bible

1968

Mission into time (original title: “A test of whole track recall”)

1968

Hubbard Dianetics Auditor’s Course Textbook

1968

Basic Staff Hat Book No I

1969

How to save your marriage

1969

When in Doubt, Communicate …

1970

Background and Ceremonies of the Church of Scientology

Sept. 1971

Basic Scientology Picture Book, Vol. I, The

Sept. 1971

Basic Dianetics Picture Book, Vol. I, The

1972

Basic Study Manual

1974

What is Scientology?

Dec 1974

Hymn of Asia

March 1975

Dianetics Today

July 1975

Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary

Dec 1976

Volunteer Minister’s Handbook, The

Dec 1976

Modern Management Technology Defined

1981

The Second Dynamic

March 1982

Understanding the E-Meter –
A book on the basics of how the E-Meter works

May 1990

Clear Body Clear Mind

1991

Understanding: The Universal Solvent

1991

Knowingness

This principle has been used back in the days with huge success:

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of PTS-RD

The PTS-RD is a very effective action and, of course, very inconvenient for a takeover team. Because PTSness of subordinates is something nice when you are following other purposes. But it cannot just be taken away. So in 1973, the “10 August Handling”6)HCOB 10 August 1973 PTS HANDLING was introduced. Obviously not by Ron because this reference collides with the 9 months that he had been missing once already.7)The Scientologist and Dutchman Michel Snoeck has presented extensive details about this mysterious time frame on his website. See the article “The Whereabouts of LRH”. http://wiseoldgoat.com/papers-scientology/hubbard_vs_nwo1_lrh-whereabouts.html  The PTS-RD is not fully replaced by this but “a gradient” is being pushed forward; one that prevents the PTS-RD in many cases. This way of handling ethics is basically out-tech because you are directed towards the wrong SP. Even if the PTS-RD should connect later on, the PC is so mis-oriented that the auditor will have great difficulties to make it right during session.

This outpoint was noticed and published8)See HCO B January 24, 1977 TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP in 1977, however, there was no opportunity to correct it. More on that in the FSPL 15 June 2003 TWISTING OF THE PTS TECH.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of Standard Dianetics

The effective Standard Dianetics, which has even been sold to a wide public in a simple instructions book since 1975, has been “improved” for the worse by NED. The certificates of Dianetics’ Auditors have been cancelled9)This never happened before, that some revision of the tech lead to the invalidation of the certs of the trained auditors in this subject! This is the basic on a chain of invalidation of certificates, later the Golden Age of Tech and such also stopped many auditors from auditing: the real purpose of such „revisions“., the tech has been unnecessarily complicated, the pattern has been changed in such a way that you would enter dead ends and the book DIANETICS TODAY has been completely removed from circulation.10)For the rehabilitation of Standard Dianetics and the extensive reasoning of my allegations, I have written 19 FSBs that are summarized in the DIANETICS AUDITOR REHABILITATION SERIES. A MUST read for every NED auditor.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of Dianetics Today

Of course people asked to “update” the book DIANETICS TODAY to NED and reissue it. That would have been few work. But the new management wanted to remove this easy access to Dianetics and turn something easy into something complicated.

So this request was “complied with” by giving something else: With the LRH ED 344R INT May 10, 1982, THE RIDGE ON THE BRIDGE a new Book 1 campaign started which was supposed to create a new boom for Scientology. Instead of the simple DIANETICS TODAY procedure R3R, the readers are expected to learn and apply the Book 1 procedure. Ron had already moved away from Book 1 at the beginning of the 50s. Not because it would not technically work (I myself am one of the exceptions: I had started to build my auditor’s activity based on Book 1 – even without a seminar – since 1987) but because it is too complicated as for many people to be successful with it. So Ron had looked around and found easier ways to make people auditors: Recall processes, the objectives, the grade processes etc. However, the baby got thrown out with the bath water and Dianetics was lost for a long time until Ron rehabilitated it in 1963 and finally in 1969. This rehabilitation culminated in the Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course (HSDC), which was finally published as a textbook: Dianetics Today. But this was taken from us and we received a more tepid Dianetics workshop without noteworthy successes.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of the Clearing Course

Hubbard’s life’s work was to create a path to Clear and OT that anyone could take. It took a long time until the basic-basic of the reactive mind could be isolated and audited. But Ron finally managed to do so in 1966. Clear can be reached during solo auditing with the clearing course because the basic-basic will be audited out there, which comes before the GPMs and allows for engrams. Since then, Ron had stressed that no other auditing creates clears and clears had never existed before11)“Know then that: 1. there is no haphazard blowing of Bank 2. no item blows out of context 3. there are no prior holes blown in the Bank for anyone, no matter what the nature of any prior auditing might have been, until the item has actually been ran.” This, for example, is what Ron says in the Clearing Course Booklet of September 1965 about the items of the basic-basics that are audited on the CC. . – How can you take away this treasure, the clearing course, from Scientologists? Simply by offering them something else: Since 1978 you have been able to go clear on Dianetics even though Ron repeatedly said it weren’t possible. Nowadays, people even go “clear” on objectives, TRs, on clay table auditing and many more. They believe it. You can actually experience terrific release conditions but not clear12)Please also compare the HCOB 05.08.65 Release Stages in which Ron explicitly describes this situation. . Instead of taking away the Clearing Course, the DCSI13)DCSI = Dianetics Clear Special Intensive – The precursor of today’s CCRD = Clear Certainty Rundown. The purpose of this program is to let a release attest as clear. At the focus of the rundown, a former release condition is searched for and rehabilitated with date & locate. was given14)My non-confidential studies regarding Clear and the OT levels I have published in the 18 FSBs of the ALTER-IS OF CLEARING AND OT-SERIES. There are more confidential FSBs about the located Alter-Is on OT II and III. to the PCs.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of Dianetics and NOTS

After convincing the Releases that they are now Clear, the new management wanted to deny them all further auditing. So in 1978 it was announced that Clears are no longer allowed to audit on Dianetics. Before, however, everyone was successfully audited up to OT on Dianetics if he had physical issues. But this has been forbidden now. But it wasn’t just taken away without replacement. It is now said that Clears should receive “NED for OTs”=NOTS instead of NED. In this NOTs there are, however, no Dianetics. The “NED for OTs” is plain fraud.

This has been tightened even more since the end of the 90s: The COB of RTC personally clarified that it was not right that “a Clear is being denied the OT levels.” Clears should go to the OT levels as quickly as possible and not be stopped with grade processing, among others, Miscavige decided. Until then, Ron’s advice of someone having all grades before going onto the Solo Levels because otherwise he would fail was almost15)“almost” because Expanded Dianetics, Power, Power Plus, R6EW and CC were usually left out. But until the end of the 90s, grades 0 to 4 and ARC-SW were at least introduced to people before they were allowed onto the solo levels. followed.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of Dianetics-Drug-RD

And while you’re at it and withdrawing Dianetics from circulation, then you can also neuter the most important first step of the bridge: the Dianetics Drug RD. It is not right that the planet’s most important instrument of power over people is simply taken away by Ron: drugs and alcohol. We live in a drug society nowadays with only about 1% teetotallers in Europe or America. However, with the Dianetics Drug RD, the following EP was reached which also represents a requirement in order to successfully go up to the next steps of the Bridge:

Freedom from the harmful effect of drugs, medicine and alcohol and free from the need to take them.16)Quoted from the Grade Chart in the book “What is Scientology?”, first edition 1978.

The Dianetics Drug RD has been mostly replaced in practice by the Scientology Drug RD which has a slightly different EP:

“Freedom from the harmful effect of drugs, medicine or alcohol.”17)HCOB December 21, 1980 THE SCIENTOLOGY DRUG RUNDOWN

Period! It doesn’t go any further! The freedom from the need to take drugs was lost with that!

Formally, the Dianetics Drug RD still exists but it is only used in about 1% of the PCs. This is because at the beginning of the bridge there is only the Objectives and the Scientology Drug RD after the Purif. This may however only key out the drugs. As soon as someone drinks just one time due to social reasons, the drug engrams will key back in sooner or later and he “will be on the bottle again.”

This is the disadvantage of Scientology processes as compared to Dianetics auditing. They may only key out and as long as someone is not really Clear (i.e. Clearing Course Clear), it will key in sooner or later. And this is precisely the mechanism the takeover team is using routinely, as shown by the following examples:

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of Int-RD

The effective Int-RD on the basis of Dianetics has been replaced by an “End of Endless Int RD” on the basis of key out. Ironically, this new RD can be continued to be delivered endlessly if the PC doesn’t desperately give up beforehand and believes that “his Int-issue can only be handled on the pre-OT levels.” – I felt the same in the Church. Int kept on keying in and for around 1000 DM I received a repair each time. Expensive but useful if you suffer from headaches.

Luckily, I did not let myself be put off to the pre-OT levels but had my wife give me two more Dianetics-Int-RD sessions three years ago (even though I was already Dianetics-Clear! as I trust LRH and not David Mayo) and I have not had any Int-headaches any more!

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of OT III

So, how can you discourage people from auditing OT III? It is, after all, the fourth most important step18)Ron’s most important achievements can especially be seen in the processes that really and finally erase (as opposed to the processes that only keyout): Dianetics, Clearing Course, OT II (the GPMs) and OT III (Dianetics was originally used there too). on Ron’s bridge besides standard Dianetics, Clearing Course and OT II. And so effective and easy.

Of course you can’t just take it away. You have to offer something else. NOTs had to be the item for this again. The EP from OT III was simply changed in such a way that, as a pre-OT, you had the feeling the original EP had been given up because it wasn’t reachable with OT III anyway. So you are willing to attest before the job has been done and – encouraged by the C/S – “continue the bridge” to NOTs. Unfortunately, NOTs does not stem from Ron19)In a spectacular copyright process in a US court, David Mayo argued that he was the sole author of the NOTs-HCOBs and the Church did not deny it: Because Mayo has fulfilled this task as an employee of the Church and that is why the copyrights belong to the Church and not to Mayo. More to Mayo and NOTS on the already mentioned website of Snoeck. and doesn’t work. Just do a simple survey among all NOTs-pre-OTs that you know and your eyes will open. My wife and I made a list with over 80 names. The list of overt products20)Among those are mental diseases, total amnesia, deaths due to cancer, suicides, total paralysis, coma, severe heart attacks, perforations of the gut and many more. And that among at least 50% of the Scientologists on NOTS! Hidden under the Confidentiality of the OT-Levels. No one wants to spread Entheta! on NOTs cannot be missed.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of Power

Power and Power Plus was a standard step on the bridge until the end of the 70s. How do you ever get rid of that. One way was to interpret Dianetics EPs as Clears, thus, the Power for this PC was taken away because LRH’s old rule counts: “No Power for Clears.” But that’s not all because some people could still demand Power who didn’t go clear on Dianetics.

So Power gets replaced by Super-Power. Everyone just likes to go along with that. The choice between Power and Super-Power (an RTRC invention of 1978) is not difficult at first glance. Apparently, it took 30 years until all preparations to deliver Super-Power have been finished.

“It’s more blessed to give than receive” on the example of OT Levels

In the 70s, real OTs were actually produced. With the old OT IV to VII. This can not only be seen in success stories but also from witnesses who were able to watch OT abilities of these graduates. The CIA was skeptical anyway and did not only let their infiltrated agents go OT but also had them scientifically checked by the MIT21)MIT= Massachusetts Institute of Technology. A US “Think Tank”. . Among the OTs who cooperated with the CIA were Ingo Swann, Hal Puthoff and Pat Price (the latter was murdered). At least Ingo Swann was at the beginning of the 70s able to demonstrate to the critical physicists at MIT that he could leave his body and move freely on the entire planet at full consciousness. He looked into any safety device of the Russians and Americans and read top-secret writings out loud to which he would have never had access with his physical body.22)Michael Snoeck has also collected data about this on his website. Among other things, there is a report in the Advance! Issue 53 from July/August 1978 OTs IN ACTION – EXPLORING THE ABILITIES OF MAN – AN INTERVIEW WITH INGO SWANN. See http://www.wiseoldgoat.com/papers-scientology/popup-windows/scn_advance53-7807_iv_ingo_swann.html

Besides the enthusiasm of the intelligence officials about the unlimited possibilities for their work, there was also a red alert: Because if Ingo Swann is able to do this, then other Scientology OT’s are also able to look into their cards. And that is not compatible with the targets of the intelligence service mafia. So there had to quickly be a plan to stop the Church of Scientology in the production of OTs. And besides the legal takeover of the Church at the beginning of 1977 and the elimination of the Hubbard family in the same year, it is exactly this “It’s more blessed to give than receive” strategy described here.

But how were you supposed to take away this OT level from the clears and pre-OTs? No one would give this up without a fight.

Well: Here they are going deep into the trick box of manipulative psychology because a simple but useless replacement just will not do here:

You first have to lay the ground with a standard fearmongering and invalidation of the OT levels: “One becomes ill from the LRH bridge”. With such a coarse lie you have to lay it on thick, otherwise every trained Scientologist will ask who “one” might be. So, again and even more so: “LRH became ill from his bridge!” – That is what David Mayo wanted to convince us of. He claims he had audited the old man himself and put him back on his feet. But no one has been able to ask the old gentleman about this since 1977 – not even his wife and children. So we have to believe the lies Mr. Mayo tells us.

Besides Miscavige, Mayo is the co-founder of RTC, which hardly anyone knows about. Here is the list of the founding members according to the protocol available at court: “Terri Gamboa, David Mayo, Norman Starkey23)The trustee of the LRH heritage. This wasn’t handled by Mary-Sue Hubbard or one of his children, no: LRH apparently only trusted a stranger with his inheritance. , Phoebe Maurer, Lyman Spurlock24)Spurlock is a Wog-lawyer and belongs to the group of lawyers who control the Church through CST. Whoever actually hired these attorneys will probably remain a mystery. Ron definitely wasn’t so credulous. , Julia Watson, and David Miscavige.” – As a member of the takeover team of the Church he claims to have received a personal writing from Ron in which he is not only declared Snr C/S Int25)A post that didn’t exist until then and isn’t even allowed to exist according to the relevant LRH references. but also “Ron’s deputy for technical questions until Rons reincarnation”. What an arrogation! Thus, Ron had been replaced as sole source of technical issues and extensive technical changes had been justified after the fact26)Details about this coup in my FSB March 25, 2005 HOW SQUIRREL TECH HAS BEEN MADE ACCEPTABLE: NOTs REVEALED..

Actually Ron had informed us about his entire mission at the beginning of the 50s already and that it would be limited to the work of one life, which now is a contradiction to the just stated claim by Mayo:

Am I Mettayya?
If you see me dead I will
then
live forever.
27)Quote from “Hymn of Asia”, 1st paragraph. ibidem.

Mayo wants to make us believe that 1) Ron has failed and his bridge made him ill, 2) that Mayo himself is now allowed to change the tech and 3) that Ron would come back to finish his work28)At least today, nearly 30 years after LRHs official date of death, we know that L. Ron Hubbard did not reincarnate to complete his work. We would have heard about this. His work was already completed in 1972, we just have to apply it in its original version..

After Scientology had been split into two movements in 1982 by extensive SP-declares of thousands of auditors, Clears, OTs, mission-holders by the takeover team, it was indispensable for David Mayo to leave the Church and set himself up as the leader of the freezone for two reasons: 1) according to the principle of the psychological trick box of “divide and rule”, you have to rule both sides of the split (thus weakened) movement. You need a leadership person for that who will undoubtedly be appreciated and 2) the squirrel concept of “It’s more blessed to give than receive” would be endangered in the freezone if David Mayo had remained in the Church: Many people knew that he was the “technical leader” who had been rewriting the tech since 1978. If he had belonged to the takeover team of the Church from the perspective of the freezone, his HCOBs from 1978 onward would have been under the microscope and the manipulation would have blown up.

But there is a tool from the psychological trick box which they used for their advantage: First, you trust people you know well, that you have ARC to. Distrust only sets in with ARC breaks. So for strategic reasons, David Mayo – and not just anyone – had to go to the freezone in order to gain popularity as an opinion leader. He strengthened that with an incredible martyr story according to which he had to run in the Californian desert as an RPF29)RPF=Rehabilitation Project Force. A highly disputed project supposedly from LRH, but actually not, into which Sea Org Members get placed who have been disgraced. prisoner for weeks, until he was finally able to blow. This martyr-ism made him look like a hero and basically untouchable in the freezone. Beneficiary: The takeover team and their strategy of a step-by-step change of the tech by “It’s more blessed to give than receive.”

This is how NOTs remained unquestioned in the FZ (why NOTs also remained unquestioned in the Church, even though it was written by the “bad SP and squirrel” David Mayo, is a special trick of the psychological trick box and has to do with a ban on thinking). Subsequently, people basically continue to audit without limits because you can’t finally solve the OT III case with NOTs. With the OT III tech including Dianetics according to LRH’s original writings it is however possible.

By successfully introducing NOTs in 1979 for the degradation of OT III, and thus not allowing anyone to exit the non-interference-zone30)This is the bridge area between R6EW and OT III completion included. In this non-interference-zone no other auditing may take place so that the person can concentrate and quickly get through these solo actions without getting into any Q&A., which would have just been extended with NOTs, they made sure that the PCs and pre-OTs wouldn’t get any more auditing for the rest of their life: At least not the useful kind as LRH had once developed. Only assists, rudiments or weak recall processes, at best.

Therefore, there was no demand any more for the old OT IV to VII because no one was reaching it any more and fulfilling the requirements. In order to not make this fraud so obvious, because statistics enjoy a lot of attention in Scientology, the OT levels IV to VII have simply been replaced (not just cancelled without replacement because that’s not what you do, right?). They were replaced with … NOTS. They just split NOTS into four arbitrary parts and called them New OT IV (NOTs-drug-RD), New OT V (audited NOTs), New OT VI (Solo-NOTs-course31)A revealing anomaly: a simple training course becomes an entire OT level. Up to then, the respective training had always been an integral part of the solo level, e.g. with R6EW, CC, OT I, OT II, OT III. But how else are you supposed to make four different levels out of the simple squirrel product NOTS?  ) and New OT VII (Solo-NOTs).

This seemed as matching to me as the following fraud: Four of seven expensive emergency vehicles were stolen from the company parking lot. The ones with the labelling IV, V, VI and VII. Since the manager has the habit of looking down to the parking lot from his office on the top floor and count the vehicles, the embezzled employee took an old bicycle, instead of the four vehicles, broke it into four pieces, spread it out on the 4 parking spots and labelled them with signs IV, V, VI and VII.

As if to say: “It’s more blessed to give than receive.”

Maybe it’ll work!?

Andreas Gross

for the

Independent Scientologists

Copyright © 2015 by Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Gross, All Rights reserved

References   [ + ]

1. Translated from a German proverb
2. Hubbard, LaFayette Ron, 1974, Book "Hymn of Asia", First Printing, Los Angeles, Publications Organization Worldwide.
3. However, you have to trust RTC and David Miscavige because he hasn't proved any of it, he's just made claims. But even old hands of the Freezone are going crazy about the new books: "I have to have these!"
4. International Freezone Association. See www.internationalfreezone.net
5. www.upperbridge.org is a website worth reading, but afaik he failed to fulfill his promise, no further comparison of the books was published.
6. HCOB 10 August 1973 PTS HANDLING
7. The Scientologist and Dutchman Michel Snoeck has presented extensive details about this mysterious time frame on his website. See the article "The Whereabouts of LRH". http://wiseoldgoat.com/papers-scientology/hubbard_vs_nwo1_lrh-whereabouts.html 
8. See HCO B January 24, 1977 TECH CORRECTION ROUND-UP
9. This never happened before, that some revision of the tech lead to the invalidation of the certs of the trained auditors in this subject! This is the basic on a chain of invalidation of certificates, later the Golden Age of Tech and such also stopped many auditors from auditing: the real purpose of such „revisions“.
10. For the rehabilitation of Standard Dianetics and the extensive reasoning of my allegations, I have written 19 FSBs that are summarized in the DIANETICS AUDITOR REHABILITATION SERIES. A MUST read for every NED auditor.
11. "Know then that: 1. there is no haphazard blowing of Bank 2. no item blows out of context 3. there are no prior holes blown in the Bank for anyone, no matter what the nature of any prior auditing might have been, until the item has actually been ran." This, for example, is what Ron says in the Clearing Course Booklet of September 1965 about the items of the basic-basics that are audited on the CC.
12. Please also compare the HCOB 05.08.65 Release Stages in which Ron explicitly describes this situation.
13. DCSI = Dianetics Clear Special Intensive – The precursor of today's CCRD = Clear Certainty Rundown. The purpose of this program is to let a release attest as clear. At the focus of the rundown, a former release condition is searched for and rehabilitated with date & locate.
14. My non-confidential studies regarding Clear and the OT levels I have published in the 18 FSBs of the ALTER-IS OF CLEARING AND OT-SERIES. There are more confidential FSBs about the located Alter-Is on OT II and III.
15. "almost" because Expanded Dianetics, Power, Power Plus, R6EW and CC were usually left out. But until the end of the 90s, grades 0 to 4 and ARC-SW were at least introduced to people before they were allowed onto the solo levels.
16. Quoted from the Grade Chart in the book "What is Scientology?", first edition 1978.
17. HCOB December 21, 1980 THE SCIENTOLOGY DRUG RUNDOWN
18. Ron's most important achievements can especially be seen in the processes that really and finally erase (as opposed to the processes that only keyout): Dianetics, Clearing Course, OT II (the GPMs) and OT III (Dianetics was originally used there too).
19. In a spectacular copyright process in a US court, David Mayo argued that he was the sole author of the NOTs-HCOBs and the Church did not deny it: Because Mayo has fulfilled this task as an employee of the Church and that is why the copyrights belong to the Church and not to Mayo. More to Mayo and NOTS on the already mentioned website of Snoeck.
20. Among those are mental diseases, total amnesia, deaths due to cancer, suicides, total paralysis, coma, severe heart attacks, perforations of the gut and many more. And that among at least 50% of the Scientologists on NOTS! Hidden under the Confidentiality of the OT-Levels. No one wants to spread Entheta!
21. MIT= Massachusetts Institute of Technology. A US "Think Tank".
22. Michael Snoeck has also collected data about this on his website. Among other things, there is a report in the Advance! Issue 53 from July/August 1978 OTs IN ACTION – EXPLORING THE ABILITIES OF MAN – AN INTERVIEW WITH INGO SWANN. See http://www.wiseoldgoat.com/papers-scientology/popup-windows/scn_advance53-7807_iv_ingo_swann.html
23. The trustee of the LRH heritage. This wasn't handled by Mary-Sue Hubbard or one of his children, no: LRH apparently only trusted a stranger with his inheritance.
24. Spurlock is a Wog-lawyer and belongs to the group of lawyers who control the Church through CST. Whoever actually hired these attorneys will probably remain a mystery. Ron definitely wasn't so credulous.
25. A post that didn't exist until then and isn't even allowed to exist according to the relevant LRH references.
26. Details about this coup in my FSB March 25, 2005 HOW SQUIRREL TECH HAS BEEN MADE ACCEPTABLE: NOTs REVEALED.
27. Quote from "Hymn of Asia", 1st paragraph. ibidem.
28. At least today, nearly 30 years after LRHs official date of death, we know that L. Ron Hubbard did not reincarnate to complete his work. We would have heard about this. His work was already completed in 1972, we just have to apply it in its original version.
29. RPF=Rehabilitation Project Force. A highly disputed project supposedly from LRH, but actually not, into which Sea Org Members get placed who have been disgraced.
30. This is the bridge area between R6EW and OT III completion included. In this non-interference-zone no other auditing may take place so that the person can concentrate and quickly get through these solo actions without getting into any Q&A.
31. A revealing anomaly: a simple training course becomes an entire OT level. Up to then, the respective training had always been an integral part of the solo level, e.g. with R6EW, CC, OT I, OT II, OT III. But how else are you supposed to make four different levels out of the simple squirrel product NOTS?
Posted in Blog and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *