All LRH Materials on the Internet

The Church of Scientology claims a monopoly on tech. LRH has spoken in the PDC-20 talk about what he thinks of such a monopoly: It is exclusively in the interest of the other side! To break this monopoly, there are a number of initiatives in place to allow Scientologists outside the Church to access the […]

Continue reading

War by redefinition of Words: Reactive Mind redefined

Originally composed in 2006 by Caspar de Rijk, Cl IX TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE OF 20 MARCH 2006 Independent Scientologists RO NL Public Original Bridge Series 5 REACTIVE MIND, DEFINITION OF It has been found that the definition of Reactive Mind as given in the current Tech Dictionary is incomplete. As this is a key point in […]

Continue reading

Back to the original LRH-Bridge of 1970

Originally composed in 2006 by Caspar de Rijk, Cl IX TECHNICAL BRIEFING OF 31 JANUARY 2006 Independent Scientologists RO NL Public   Original Bridge Series 4 REVERTING TO THE ORIGINAL LRH BRIDGE   We have been from the start in August 2003 a Ron’s Org, set up by and structured after the Ron’s Org in […]

Continue reading

Dianetics Clear is just a temporary key-out, a release

Originally composed in 2005 by Caspar de Rijk, Cl IX TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF 24 OCTOBER 2005 -III Independent Scientologists RO NL Public   Original Bridge Series 3 DIANETIC CLEAR vs SCIENTOLOGY CLEAR Hypothesis: There is a difference between Dianetic Clear and Scientology Clear. Tech Data: Here again, comparing/evaluating bulletins against bulletins and basics.(consistency) HCOB 7 […]

Continue reading

Dianetics must be delivered before the Scientology Grades

Originally composed in 2005 by Caspar de Rijk, Cl IX RO NL Case Supervisor TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF 24 OCTOBER 2005 -I     Independent Scientologists RO NL Public Original Bridge Series 1 NEW THEORY of the NEW GRADE CHART Observation: In 1981 New Era Dianetics was placed after Grade IV on the Classification and Gradation […]

Continue reading

The difference between NED New Era Dianetics and the original Standard Dianetics

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF 24 OCTOBER 2005 -II Independent Scientologists RO NL Public Original Bridge Series 2 NEW ERA DIANETICS vs STANDARD DIANETICS by Caspar de Rijk The main technical changes of New Era Dianetics in 1978 were: 1.  Redefinition of erasure i.e. postulate off=erasure 2. Redefinition of somatics 3. Drop of principle of unburdening (going […]

Continue reading

The last Grade Chart (The Bridge) which was LRH-approved

Here you can see all necessary processes listed per Grade and LRH insists: “ALL PROCESSES OF THE LEVEL AND NO LESS”: After the publication of this chart Expanded Dianetics (XDN) was developed until LRH disappeared in 1972. As XDN was not completed by LRH this tech is nearly lost.  

Continue reading

Scientific evidence for OT phenomena

“Where are the scientific evidence for psychic, so-called PSI phenomena? Show me the evidence!”The standard demand of skeptics sounds like this or something similar when it comes to the proof of phenomena such as distance healing, remote perception, telepathy (transmission of thoughts), premonitions or the power of the mind over matter (Telekinesis) and at the […]

Continue reading

3 fake RTC-HCOBs on FPRD & Sec-Checking identified by Class IX Case Supervisor

This valuable tech eval I got from Caspar de Rijk, a class IX 14 years ago. I want to make that public now as a service to auditors, who might still apply this out-tech:

Continue reading

Streaming LRH Lectures

I happily forward this Good News to you: SCIENTOLiPEDIA.org The ‘Flagship’ for Scientology Outside the Church (#ScientologyOTC) Free Streaming – ALL LRH Lectures Scientolipedia.org is very happy to announce the launch of a Free Streaming service which lets you listen to any and all of L Ron Hubbard’s lectures on your home computer, Android device […]

Continue reading

Unclear on Co-Auditing Method One Word Clearing

When I first read Andreas’ analysis of outpoints and squirreling on the Bridge, I had a hard time believing it. Full article here: Bridge changes since 1972 In particular was the issue of the Method One Co-Audit, the first step on the training side. I asked myself how could a person who trains to become […]

Continue reading

Misunderstandings about Rons FSM-Program

In the 1980ies and 1990ies my wife and I have been very active as full time field auditors and FSMs for the German Orgs, especially the Hamburg Org. In this time I had a lot to do to clear up any misunderstandings about Rons FSM-Program. Outside the church I got the idea, that FSMing is […]

Continue reading