Tag Archives: RTC
Query as FSM re HCO PL 29. April 1982 Issue II “Field Auditing Fees”
My Query on HCO PL29 April 1982 Issue II “Field Auditing Fees” is a well-documented revelation of a counterfeit HCOPL. The fake-Policy aims to bring the field auditors under control, who until then had been able to disseminate and operate.
Continue readingAll LRH Materials on the Internet
The Church of Scientology claims a monopoly on tech. LRH has spoken in the PDC-20 talk about what he thinks of such a monopoly: It is exclusively in the interest of the other side! To break this monopoly, there are a number of initiatives in place to allow Scientologists outside the Church to access the […]
Continue readingThe difference between NED New Era Dianetics and the original Standard Dianetics
TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF 24 OCTOBER 2005 -II Independent Scientologists RO NL Public Original Bridge Series 2 NEW ERA DIANETICS vs STANDARD DIANETICS by Caspar de Rijk The main technical changes of New Era Dianetics in 1978 were: 1. Redefinition of erasure i.e. postulate off=erasure 2. Redefinition of somatics 3. Drop of principle of unburdening (going […]
Continue readingThe purpose of RTCs PRO-TRs Course is to get rid of the TRs on the long run
David wrote a nice article about Pizzagate, the pederasty scandal of Hitlory Clinton and her friends in Washington DC. Pizzagate is a “nice subject” which has to be confronted. The cannibalism, satanism and child abuses of the ruling class and their officers. You need your TR0 welldone to be able to confront this. Otherwise people can “read and hear” […]
Continue readingConfusion on CC, CC RD and DCSI introduced
One of my happy followers wrote me by email: 1. I am curious if the clear certainly rundown CCRD is the same as the Clearing Course CC? I know the placement of clear is wrong on the bridge but curious if there is any real difference? 2. If one is not clear on this rundown per the […]
Continue reading1973 introduced fake HCOB on Axiom 28 COMMUNICATION
A series of fakes on the Scientology Axiom 28 COMMUNICATION got my attention. A lot of confusion had to be as-issed: On 25 May 1986 a fake HCOB revision was cancelled by “L. Ron Hubbard Library” (=CST): References [ + ] 1. ↑ do we already got the hyper inflation? 2. ↑ I quote the Axioms […]
Continue readingRTC is confused about R3R – crashing MU reveals non-involvement of LRH
Do you need a proof, that NED or R3RA is a fake? It was written by someone with a crashing MU – definitely not LRH:
Continue readingRon knew the future
In the article “my only defence for having lived” dated 15. Aug 1966 by L. Ron Hubbard he wrote: I could read minds and foretell the future with great accuracy. Such accomplishments startle people and I early learned in this lifetime to keep my own actual abilities to myself or else find sociability impossible. Usually […]
Continue readingAfter 1972 Scientology was taken over and falsified
L. Ron Hubbard’s life’s work was the development of Dianetics and Scientology – a gift to humanity on earth to free itself from suppression and the reactive bank. For decades, Ron had been persecuted and hated because of that by the power tools of the self-proclaimed “elite” and ruling families. At the end of the […]
Continue readingHow Squirrel Tech has been made acceptable: NOTs revealed
During his class VIII lectures, Ron repeatedly pointed out how it can come to squirreling. I’m quoting Ron: On an examination I just gave you haven’t yet got the exact mechanism of how an individual squirrels, and you better damn well get it. The individual has been audited non standardly, therefore he appears to be […]
Continue readingDavid Mayo is the prime suspect of having been the instrument to sabotage LRH-tech.
Caspar de Rijk, Class IX made an eval on the tech alter is and came to the conclusion, that also since 1975 the tech of LRH was alter-ised to an unworkable state. When he wrote this, Caspar was the founder of the RONS Org Netherland.
Continue readingThe Evil Role of David Mayo
David Mayo plays a very controversial role in the history of Scientology: For some (CoS) he was the bad scapegoat, an SP and a squirrel, and for others (Free Zone) he was the only true “Senior C/S Int” and the personal auditor of LRH and his technical successor. I would like to gather a bit […]
Continue reading
English
Deutsch