David Mayo Archives - Hostile-Takeover of Scientology since 1972

The difference between NED New Era Dianetics and the original Standard Dianetics

TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF 24 OCTOBER 2005 -II Independent Scientologists RO NL Public Original Bridge Series 2 NEW ERA DIANETICS vs […]

[pdf-embedder url=”https://scientology-1972.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/FSB-20170914-Obviously-Faked-Tech-of-the-Later-CS-Series.pdf”]

One of my happy followers wrote me by email: 1. I am curious if the clear certainly rundown CCRD is

I just found this interesting report or anecdote by former ED Int Bill Franks, which I will quote in full.

Remimeo The landing page of Pierre Ethier’s (Class XII) website((Download on 4 July 2006 from www.angelfire.com/pro/class12/ )) shows the complete

During his class VIII lectures, Ron repeatedly pointed out how it can come to squirreling. I’m quoting Ron: On an

The Free Scientologists work according to the original bridge that was published in June 1970 and is available today.((You can

Caspar de Rijk, Class IX made an eval on the tech alter is and came to the conclusion, that also

David Mayo plays a very controversial role in the history of Scientology: For some (CoS) he was the bad scapegoat,

The false data of “Natural Clears” comes from David Mayo, and not from LRH, because Ron writes: We know all

Every child knows: “Knife, scissors, fire and light are not for small children!”((Translated from a German proverb)) And every educated

According to the quotes in the FSB of February 24, 2004 You can only become Clear on the Clearing-Course! undoubtedly shows

Someone had put together all available historical data about Scientology and the Freezone and its enemies and sorted that chronological.

This letter is about 33 years old, so I have added it to my blog under the original Date of